Net neutrality took a punch to the gut this past week when a federal appeals court in Washington struck down the Federal Communication Commission’s rules related to how broadband providers manage network traffic. The rules notably prevented providers from discriminating against certain types of traffic. For example, the rules would keep a provider from throttling Netflix speeds in order to promote its own competing streaming video service.
This could potentially create a bit of a Wild West feel on the Internet, with providers charging access fees or priority fees to insure companies like Netflix or Amazon can reach their customers seamlessly. There are a lot of “ifs” here, but mostly we’ll have to wait and see what the broadband providers choose to do with their new-found power.
I’ve talked to people who read about the decision, but then just shrug their shoulders and go on, not giving it a second thought. Other people are plenty upset, leading to comments like CNET reader ajsebas writing, “This is utterly shocking and outrageous.”
It could be awhile before end users notice any impact from the ruling. It may be hard to convince the general public to care too much unless it starts to show up in terms of higher prices for Internet-delivered services like streaming video.
Appeals court strikes down FCC’s Net neutrality rules
Why you should care about Net neutrality (FAQ)
AT&T says ‘sponsored data’ does not violate Net neutrality
White House tries to prevent ruling on NSA surveillance
Pilot claims he saw UFO about to hit plane, so he ducked